January 8, 2016, FCC Daily Digest

The January 8 FCC Daily Digest includes a Draft 2016 Broadband Progress Report released by FCC Chairman Wheeler’s office.  The draft report is focused on broadband (both fixed and mobile) for the general public and does not cover public safety.   However, it is interesting information to consider as Public Safety in the Future may encompass the new environment public safety will face over the next few years.

FACT SHEET: CHAIRMAN WHEELER’S PROPOSED 2016 BROADBAND PROGRESS REPORT.   Fact Sheet on Chairman Wheeler’s Proposed 2016 Broadband Progress Report.  FACT SHEET. News Media Contact: Mark Wigfield (202) 418-0253  WTB WCB . Contact Mark Wigfield (202) 418-0253 https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-337173A1.docx; https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-337173A1.pdf

 

IAFC Endorses Backup Power Petition

The International Association of Fire Chiefs says it supports a petition filed by the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates and various other consumer advocacy entities (TRDaily, Dec. 2, 2015) asking the FCC to reconsider its decision not to make service providers responsible for ensuring that backup power is available for voice services that are not line-powered.  A report and order released in August requires providers of facilities-based, fixed, voice residential service to offer consumers an eight-hour backup power solution that can be purchased at the point of sale (TRDaily, Aug. 6, 2015), with a 24-hour option to be available within three years.

“The FCC needs to ensure that as new technologies evolve they provide reasonable access to 911 to individuals during loss of electrical power to a residence or other customer location regardless of the cause,” the IAFC said in a Dec. 28 ex parte filing in PS docket 14-174. “In enabling new technologies for 911, the standard of performance should be reliability that is at least equivalent to the current universal access landline telephone network. The Rule and Order fail[s] to meet this standard.”

Courtesy TRDaily

LightSquared Requests License Changes, 1675-1680 MHz Reallocation, Auction

LightSquared has asked the FCC to modify its licenses to fulfill the conditions in spectrum use agreements it hammered out with Deere & Company and Garmin International, Inc., and it also wants the Commission to launch a proceeding to reallocate and auction the 1675-1680 megahertz band, which is used by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. “This comprehensive approach will allow the Commission to put this vital mid-band spectrum to use for the American consumer while addressing the concerns of both the GPS industry and government agencies interested in ensuring the compatibility of New LightSquared’s terrestrial operations,” the company said in a Dec. 31 filing in IB dockets 12-340 and 11-109. Continue reading

FCC Denies Waiver for Steel Plant

The Mobility Division of the FCC’s Wireless Telecommunications Bureau today denied a request by Carpenter Technology Corp. for a waiver of section 90.35(c)(47) of the agency’s rules to permit continuous carrier operation on the 457.5250 megahertz, 457.6000 MHz, and 457.6125 MHz frequencies at a steel manufacturing facility in Reading, Pa.

Courtesy TRDaily

 

More Cops on Beat Not Necessarily Better, Ohlhausen Says

LAS VEGAS — Republican Federal Trade Commissioner Maureen Ohlhausen disagrees with the notion sometimes espoused by her fellow commissioner, Democrat Julie Brill, that “more cops on the beat” are better when it comes to enforcement, particularly with respect to data collection practices. Speaking during a panel discussion on privacy  at the Consumer Technology Association’s CES conference, Commissioner Ohlhausen said that if the FCC “adopts a very different sort of enforcement standard” from that of the Federal Trade Commission, “people who are effectively competing with each other” will face different requirements. Continue reading

800 MHz Emission Mask Order Circulated

An order that deals with emission mask requirements for digital technologies on 800 megahertz band NPSPAC channels was circulated to FCC Commissioners Jan. 5, according to the agency’s weekly list of circulated items. The draft item would adopt proposals included in a notice of proposed rulemaking approved in 2013 to enhance interoperability and improve interference protection in the 800 MHz band, an agency source told TRDaily.

In the NPRM adopted in PS docket 13-209, the FCC proposed to require that digital technologies, including but not limited to terrestrial trunked radio (TETRA) technologies, comply with Emission Mask H when operating in 800 MHz band NPSPAC channels (TRDaily, Aug. 27, 2013).

The FCC received mixed views on the NPRM, although some key public safety and industry players endorsed the Emission Mask H proposal (TRDaily, Nov. 13, 2013).- Paul Kirby, paul.kirby@wolterskluwer.com

Courtesy TRDaily

 

Eight States Diverted Portions of 911 Funds in 2014, FCC Report Says

Eight states in 2014 diverted a portion of funds collected for 911 and enhanced 911 (E911) purposes to non-911 activities, according to the FCC’s seventh report to Congress on the issue. In all, $223.4 million in 911 and E911 funds were diverted in 2014 “by all reporting jurisdictions,” or 8.8% of the total collected, according to the report. The FCC today sought comment on the report, which covers the 2014 calendar year. Comments are due Feb. 8 and replies March 9 in PS docket 09-14.

The report said that of the eight states that diverted 911 and E911 fees for other purposes in 2014, five said they used a portion of the funds for other public safety or emergency response programs. Those states were California, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Virginia, and West Virginia. Illinois, New York, and Rhode Island said they diverted funds for non-public safety or unspecified purposes. Continue reading

Andy Seybold’s Public Safety Advocate, January 8, 2016

A while ago I wrote an article entitled, “While We Wait for FirstNet,” which was about how Public Safety entities should move forward with commercial network operators for some broadband experience. However, now “While We Wait for FirstNet” is about waiting, patiently I trust, for the release the RFP the Board of Directors approved at their December meeting. I am sure the document is finished and ready to go. I am also sure that FirstNet, Public Safety, and the vendor community want it on the street as soon as possible. However, the wheels of government grind slowly forward and I suspect that final federal approvals are being discussed ad nauseum by legal types in various government departments and agencies.

It appears that while FirstNet is acting more and more like the “independent authority” Congress intended it to be, some are bent on making sure that all the federal rules and regulations are adhered to and that they have the final say in order to “remind” FirstNet that it is, in fact, still a part of the federal government. No matter, I am confident this will be settled soon and the document will make its way onto the street where the vendors, consultants, Public Safety community, and anyone else with an interest will be able to read it, dissect it, and then busy themselves answering it and/or making waves because it did not contain this, that, or the other thing. I have always taken a view of his RFP that it is nothing more than a vendor’s entry ticket into the stadium. Vendors will have to prove they have the technical expertise, the marketing expertise, the operational expertise, and by the way, a bank account or line of credit that will support a $20-$35 billion investment before realizing a return on investment.

Once a vendor receives a ticket to the big game it will be shown into the arena where it will be seated at the table across from all sorts of FirstNet and related federal folks who are there to discuss the RFP response and, more than that, to negotiate the best deal FirstNet can make for the benefit of the Public Safety community. The final choice won’t be made solely on the RFP response but on the after-RFP negotiations that must assuredly take place. In reality, if FirstNet were a private enterprise, given the same task it would have been sitting down across the table from vendors several years ago discussing what needed to be done and how best to accomplish it. But since it is part of the federal government, FirstNet is not permitted to sit down at the negotiating table until the vendor has passed muster by spending thousands of dollars and man-hours responding to the RFP that will change numerous times during network build-out.

If you have ever had a house built you know that if you compare the plans submitted to the building department to obtain your permit and the “as built” plans your contractor will return to you with the key to your new house they will differ in many, many ways. This effort represents a project that has never been done before. The government’s aborted attempts to build a nationwide shared land mobile radio system ended up in disaster, and now it thinks it has to oversee what FirstNet is doing and which vendor should be chosen. We do not know how many vendors or entities will step up to the RFP. AT&T this week said in a public forum that it will aggressively pursue the opportunity and Rivada Networks, which has some very smart technology folks, will probably bid, but beyond that?

Perhaps systems integration companies with partners, other commercial network operators such as Verizon which, for some reason seems to be a favored horse in the race simply because its spectrum is adjacent to FirstNet’s, or someone we don’t suspect has any interest? Some potential vendors may pre-announce their interest only to secure a spot and potentially scare away other bidders. Some may submit a half-hearted bid so that later they can take FirstNet and the winning bidder to court and challenge the decision, delaying this desperately needed system. Then there will be those who believe they can provide Public Safety with the network it needs and deserves and that in doing so they can also recoup their investment over time and even make some money. Who is going to step up to try for the winning ticket for the seat at the table? That, of course, we cannot know until the RFP responses are received by FirstNet and even then, depending on the rules, we may not be informed of the names of the entities that submitted bids.

As we sit waiting, with staffs already assigned to the task of responding, with deals being cut between potential partners, we are all anxious to see what, exactly, the first version of the RFP has morphed into. I have been told that it is less of a procurement document than a document inviting potential partners to submit their ideas about how to build the network and put it into operation. I hope what I have been told proves to be true. There are a number of issues what might spook potential vendors from responding but hopefully there are more enticements in the document than gotchas. While we wait for FirstNet and the federal government to release the RFP it is important to keep in mind that according to the norm within the federal government, FirstNet is moving forward at warp speed and too fast for some of those accustomed to the “normal” crawl of government projects.

According to the Public Safety and vendor community, the network should have been largely up and running by now, and somewhere in between is where we are. No one can blame FirstNet for the delays, but that does not mean FirstNet or any of us are happy about them. I expect to see the RFP next week at some point, simply because I think even the federal attorneys will finally agree that this RFP needs to be on the street sooner rather than later. Have a Great Weekend, Andy
FirstNet reviews 2015 progressFloridaNet via Google Alerts Jan  6 14:10 The First Responder Network Authority, or FirstNet, said 2015 was a year of significant progress in its effort to build out a nationwide public safety …

Hawaii Shares Key Use Cases, Demonstrates Commitment to FirstNet at Initial Consultation MeetingFirst Responder Network Authority via Google Alerts Jan  8 06:05 By Keone Kali, FirstNet Region 9 Lead More than 80 public safety representatives from Hawaii joined the FirstNet team for the state’s Initial … Continue reading

S&T Press Release: DHS S&T and USCG RDC Launches Prize Competition for Environmentally Friendly Buoy Mooring Systems

Washington, DC – The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Science and Technology Directorate (S&T), in conjunction with the United States Coast Guard’s Research and Development Center (USCG RDC), launched the “Environmentally Friendly Replacement for Buoy Mooring Systems” prize competition, with a maximum award of up to $290,000.

S&T and the USCG Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E) Program are seeking innovative technologies from individuals and entities to improve navigational buoy mooring systems so as to have minimal impacts on the ocean floor and environmentally sensitive areas.

“Improving our buoy mooring systems is critical,” said Dr. Reginald Brothers, DHS Under Secretary for Science and Technology. “Our current mooring system is outdated and hasn’t changed in decades. We want a system that is friendly to our ocean floors, especially in environmentally sensitive areas.”

Interested in learning more? Read the full S&T Press Release.

Mission Critical Magazine Reports “Public-Safety Entities Outline 800 MHz Interference Concerns in FCC Filings,” By Sandra Wendelken, Editor, January 5, 2016

Several recent FCC filings are detailing problems with interference between 800 MHz public-safety systems and commercial networks, but public-safety entities offered different suggestions on the best way to address the problems. Read complete article here: http://mccmag.com/News/NewsDetails/newsID/13774