S&T Snapshot: CAUSE IV – Lessons Learned from the U.S. Canadian Cross-Border Experiment

A tornado has just devastated a community on the border between the United States and Canada. Paramedics scramble to bring patients from over-crowded hospitals across the border. Communication blackouts and downed trees force ambulances to weave their way through blowing debris, fallen electrical lines, and car wrecks. The time for a routine trip from the injury site to the hospital has now tripled. While this didn’t really happen, it was the focus in April when the Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Directorate (S&T), the Defence Research and Development Canada’s Centre for Security Science (DRDC CSS) and Public Safety Canada collaborated on a cross-border experiment with a focus on preparing emergency responders for this type of scenario. The fourth installment of the Canada-U.S. Enhanced Resiliency Experiment (CAUSE IV) unfolded in the aftermath of a fictional tornado along the Michigan-Ontario border—real first responders used real gear, vehicles, and standard operating procedures to ensure that citizens and communities remained safe and received necessary care during and after the “storm.”

CAUSE IV was designed to highlight critical aspects of an emergency of this magnitude: overarching situational awareness, reliable communications tools, public alerts and warning, and access to real time data for decision-making and resource allocation. The program consisted of two vignettes.  Read more on NPSTC’s blog or on S&T Snapshot: CAUSE IV – Lessons Learned from the U.S. Canadian Cross-Border Experiment.

The first, led by DRDC CSS, focused on establishing a public safety broadband network (PSBN) for emergency responders crossing the U.S.-Canada border. The second vignette, led by S&T’s First Responders Group (FRG), examined the full disaster lifecycle, from resource planning to mutual aid, and tested how information from social media and 211 could provide situational awareness that could integrate with other data and effectively manage post-disaster response. For example, during the experiment, information about a road obstruction was identified by digital volunteers on social media and a new route was relayed to the paramedics transporting a patient across the border. S&T Program Manager Denis Gusty explained how each of the two vignettes were both critical components to achieving interoperability during the experiment, “You really couldn’t have one without the other. In the event of a large-scale natural disaster—in this case a simulated tornado—cross-border communication between hospitals, dispatchers and paramedics would be a central part of post-disaster management.”

The first vignette established a constant broadband connection between emergency responders as they shuttled “patients” across the border. Ambulances from St. Clair County (Michigan) and Lambton County (Ontario) tested voice, video and data applications and services.

“[The PSBN is] so critical for border towns, especially because we’re so close. If there is a disaster and we can’t communicate to each other—especially with our first responders and our ambulances—that can cause a detriment to our healthcare, ” said Betty Falecki, Lake Huron’s Director of Emergency Services and Preparedness. When American ambulances cross over into Canada, the receiving Canadian hospitals are unable to communicate with them because each country currently operates on separate networks. Falecki explained, “They’re in a dead zone. Once [the ambulances] cross the borders they have no communication whatsoever with us. If we can establish that operability, we can become one.”

“CAUSE IV is really the first time we’ve built a stand-alone bridge between those two networks,” said Jeff Brooks, Deputy Manager of the County of Lambton EMS Department.

The public safety broadband network technology that was tested during the experiment operated in the 700 megahertz Band 14, which allowed CAUSE IV operators to seamlessly transmit data such as patient vital signs, electrocardiograms and live video in real time from hospital to hospital and ambulance to hospital.

The experiment consisted of two temporary public safety broadband networks. In order to accurately emulate both FirstNet in the United States and the future PSBN in Canada, the base stations were located in Port Huron, Michigan and Sarnia, Ontario but the evolved packed core networks (EPC) for both countries were located at the Communications Research Centre (CRC) in Ottawa, Canada. The entire vignette one system was designed and implemented by DRDC CSS, the Communications Research Centre Canada (CRC) and Texas A&M University. “With this technology we’ll be able to maintain communication in the event that the patient deteriorates, there’s a problem with the vehicle, or the crew needs directions,” Brooks added. “Video conferencing with the physician that’s receiving the patient could potentially provide better managed patient care. Doctors will have more information and will be ready for the patients when they arrive.” “Having all key stakeholders able to communicate via voice, data, or other situational awareness tools helped paramedics to perform time-critical medical interventions, which increased patient care,” said Doug Socha, DRDC CSS’s Paramedic Portfolio Manager. The other element to CAUSE IV was the work S&T carried out in vignette two to test the use of social media and digital volunteers for enhanced situational awareness. This data was analyzed in real time to permit Emergency Operations Centers (EOC) to detect, evaluate, and plan improved response. “Incident data collected from social media could inform the safest and fastest route for an ambulance crossing the border to take, saving time and ultimately, the lives of victims,” Gusty said.

This included various methods to utilize the ‘citizen as a sensor’ concept, including having trained weather spotters report current weather conditions using a GeoForm in the field, and digital volunteers submitting information to the EOC related to road blocks, downed trees, and flash floods observed in social media (on Twitter accounts created just for the CAUSE IV experiment). The data gained from the field reports was then automatically generated into a base map that included critical infrastructure and key information. EOC personnel could then make decisions on how to plan response efforts based on what the weather spotters reported in real time.

Jeff Friedland, Director of Homeland Security Emergency Management for St. Clair County, Michigan,noted how the experiment’s use of public participation digital volunteers could be essential for first responders moving forward. “CAUSE IV showed us how to mine social media and extract what is critical or what really pertains to us and apply it instantly to our maps.” Another problem examined during vignette two was the struggle to allocate precious resources during post-disaster damage assessment. Friedland said, “We’re also automating damage assessment that citizens fill out electronically. It tells us where we need to send our damage assessment personnel. It prioritizes all the damage in the county and records on a continuous basis, keeps track of the number of homes destroyed, along with major and minor damage.”

Illustrating what’s ahead for 211 call centers across Canada and the United States, Jennifer Tanner, Project Manager for 211 in Southwest Ontario, said, “We have all this information from callers that we’re able to share with municipalities and hopefully that information can help inform the decisions that are made in an EOC during an emergency.”

Experiment findings and lessons learned will be published in a CAUSE IV after-action report that will be posted in fall 2016 at www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/first-responders. For questions about CAUSE IV and the individual vignettes, email first.responder@dhs.gov.

NPSTC Blasts Federated Proposal

The National Public Safety Telecommunications Council has joined the Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials-International in panning the proposed use of a spectrum access system (SAS) to maximize use of the 4.9 gigahertz band.  In a filing in May, Federated Wireless, Inc., suggested the Commission approve an SAS in the spectrum, saying it would maximize use of the frequencies (TRDaily, May 19). The company pointed out the Commission adopted a three-tiered sharing framework and SAS use in the Citizens Broadband Radio Service in the 3.5 GHz band.

Last month, APCO submitted an ex parte filing criticizing the Federated proposals (TRDaily, June 1).  In a July 8 filing in WP docket 07-100, PS docket 06-229, and WT docket 06-150, NPSTC echoed APCO’s concerns.

“In summary, the primary result of Federated Wireless’ proposal appears to be that public safety would suffer a downgraded second tier status, be required to pay ongoing SAS subscription fees to SAS providers and be saddled with potential contention and interference from consumer and unlicensed WiFi users,” NPSTC complained.

“Instead of building additional confidence in the band as needed, the Federated Wireless proposal moves in the opposite direction. In contrast, APCO’s response to Federated Wireless properly emphasizes the need for frequency coordination at 4.9 GHz,” NPSTC said. “NPSTC’s 4.9 GHz National Plan Recommendations submitted previously encompass frequency coordination to help minimize interference, bandwidth limits to increase spectral efficiency, provisions for new airborne and robotic applications to enhance incident response and opportunities for spectrum access by critical infrastructure industries.” – Paul Kirby, paul.kirby@wolterskluwer.com

 Courtesy TRDaiy

 

 

FirstNet Weekly Update to the Public Safety Advisory Committee (PSAC) – July 11, 2016

FirstNet News  

The Federal Consultation Team met last week with the Department of Defense’s (DOD) Public Safety Communications Working Group and, along with FirstNet CTO staff, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) CIO, providing updates on current FirstNet activities and other topics such as the current vision for the application and device ecosystem

This week, FirstNet Board Member Governor Jim Douglas and Director of Government Affairs Edward Parkinson are traveling to Des Moines, Iowa for the annual summer meeting of the National Governors Association (NGA). Currently 30 governors are scheduled to attend, and both presumptive Presidential nominees have been invited.

Also this week, FirstNet is participating in the NTCA – The Rural Broadband Association Southeast Regional Conference in Williamsburg, Virginia; the Alaska Governance Workshop in Anchorage; the Region 5 quality of service, priority and preemption (QPP) consultation task team (CTT) meeting in St. Paul, Minnesota; the New York State Chiefs of Police Summer Meeting in Buffalo; the 2016 First Responder Resource Group conference in Washington, DC; the Florida EMS ClinCon in Orlando; the West Virginia Governance Body meeting in Sutton; the Oklahoma Governance Body meeting in Oklahoma City; the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) Interior Budget Council meeting in Rapid City, South Dakota; the Virginia Regional Preparedness Advisory Committee for Interoperability-Region II meeting in Culpepper; the Arizona Fire Chiefs 2016 Fire & EMS Leadership conference in Glendale; the Tennessee EMS Education Association conference in Murfreesboro; and the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Technical Committee meeting in Indianapolis, Indiana. Continue reading

FirstNet Working on Interoperability Matrix

The First Responder Network Authority (FirstNet) “is developing an interoperability compliance matrix that will document the technical standards and network policies that will be needed to ensure interoperability of a State or Territory deployed RAN with the NPSBN,” Rich Reed, FirstNet’s new chief customer officer, said in a blog posting today.

“Given the complexity associated with integrating a State or Territory deployed RAN with the Evolved Packet Core (EPC) to be deployed by FirstNet’s network partner as part of the nationwide deployment of the NPSBN, it is critical that FirstNet be able to identify the key data elements that will ensure interoperability and technical interconnectivity between the RAN and the EPC to ensure seamless service for public safety, as well as compliance with the Act,” Mr. Reed added.

“While FirstNet will provide the information needed for a State or Territory to successfully deploy its own RAN, this is no easy task to accomplish, and the law provides a strict and narrow timeline for States and Territories to review and submit an alternative plan,” he noted. “Accordingly, we plan to create a matrix of the key data elements to be leveraged by FirstNet’s State, Territory, and Federal partners to ensure that interoperability is achieved independent of who actually builds, deploys, and operates a RAN.  FirstNet plans to finalize the details of the matrix once it has developed a solution with its network partner, including the implementation details for the EPC, which could impact specific operational details and network policies.

“FirstNet will deliver the interoperability compliance matrix to the FCC, NTIA, and the States and Territories as expeditiously as possible, but no later than the time of delivery of State and Territory Plans,” Mr. Reed added. “The FCC and NTIA also intend to release additional guidance between now and the delivery of State and Territory Plans that will provide more clarity on their respective roles in this process.”

The blog posting noted, “Under the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 (the Act), the FCC is responsible for approving or disapproving an alternative plan based on whether or not the State or Territory has demonstrated that it will be (1) in compliance with the minimum technical interoperability requirements contained in the Interoperability Board Report, and (2) interoperable with the nationwide public safety broadband network (NPSBN).

“If the FCC approves a State or Territory’s alternative plan, the State or Territory must also apply to the NTIA for approval of such plan to enable the State or Territory to lease spectrum capacity from FirstNet, and it may, at its discretion, apply to NTIA for a grant to help support its construction of the RAN,” Mr. Reed pointed out. “In order to obtain spectrum capacity leasing rights or grant funds, a State or Territory must demonstrate, among other things, the technical capabilities to operate and the funding to support the RAN; the ability to maintain ongoing interoperability with the NPSBN; cost-effectiveness of the State or Territory’s alternative plan; and comparable timelines, security, coverage, and quality of service to that of the FirstNet provided State or Territory Plan as part of the nationwide deployment of the NPSBN.” – Paul Kirby, paul.kirby@wolterskluwer.com

Courtesy TRDaily

 

 

Parties Disagree on 5.9 GHz Sharing Issues

Parties disagree on a number of issues as the FCC refreshes its record in the 5.9 gigahertz band proceeding ahead of planned testing to analyze whether connected-vehicle and Wi-Fi applications are able to share the spectrum. Among them are how difficult it will be to share the frequencies and what sharing approach should be used. Some parties also suggested modifications to the FCC’s testing plan, and some connected-vehicle proponents said the agency’s deadline for completing testing was too optimistic.

The FCC released a public notice last month in ET docket 13-49 seeking to refresh its record (TRDaily, June 1). The public notice set a July 30 deadline for the submission of prototype unlicensed devices and a Jan. 15, 2017, deadline for the completion of testing. The public notice sought views on the FCC’s proposed test plan, as well as on pros and cons of two proposed approaches for sharing the 5850-5925 megahertz band between dedicated short-range communications (DSRC) and Wi-Fi operations.

Under Cisco Systems, Inc.’s proposal, in which the two services would share the entire 75 MHz, unlicensed devices would detect DSRC operations and vacate the spectrum. Under Qualcomm, Inc.’s plan, DSRC safety-of-life applications would use the upper 30 MHz of the spectrum, while non-safety DSRC and Wi-Fi would share the rest. That proposal is known as rechannelization.

In December, the FCC and the Commerce and Transportation departments announced a three-phase plan to test whether Wi-Fi devices can share the 5850-5925 MHz band with connected-vehicle applications without causing interference (TRDaily, Jan. 12). But first the FCC said it would update the record in its proceeding, which was launched in 2013 (TRDaily, Feb. 20, 2013). Continue reading

PSCR Launches Quarterly Newsletter

I am excited to announce the launch of the Public Safety Communications Research (PSCR) Program’s Quarterly Newsletter. We will use this newsletter to share information, news, and insights on PSCR’s current programs; highlight research and development activities; and announce engagement opportunities. Since PSCR’s inception, we have worked to accelerate the adoption and implementation of critical public safety communication technologies through cutting-edge research and development. We cannot achieve this mission without continued coordination and collaboration with the public safety community, industry, academia, and government partners. Our hope is that this newsletter will enhance our relationships with our stakeholders by providing glimpses into our current efforts and identify partnership opportunities. We want this newsletter to be valuable to our partners, we encourage you to share your suggestions and feedback to help us improve our outreach.  Read newsletter here: http://npstc.org/download.jsp?tableId=37&column=217&id=3715&file=PSCR_Quarterly_Newsletter_201607.pdf

Thank you for your support,
Dereck Orr , Chief of the NIST Public Safety Communications Research Division

Andy Seybold’s PSA [Public Safety Advocate] Discovery Patterns, July 8, 2016

As you can see from the subject line we are still experimenting with our title. It now appears as though “Advocate” is a word a number of newer spam filters don’t like for some reason but we will keep trying and hopefully find a title that won’t hang up in any of your spam filters! Meanwhile, our subscriber base keeps growing and with it the number of emails we receive with comments and questions. Some emails are from people who doubt FirstNet will ever succeed, but recently many more are from people who have seen progress and are looking forward to FirstNet’s next steps. And then there are those who continue looking ahead to a time when the network is up and operational so their questions have to do with that phase of the operation.

This week one of the questions I thought was worth repeating here will hopefully elicit an answer from someone within the FirstNet community. A member of a state organization asked, “Not sure if you saw the article this week about 911 telephone providers and the FCC not releasing information on the number and duration of 911 outages because some of the information contained proprietary vendor information. Based on what I’ve seen from FirstNet so far I have serious concerns about FirstNet’s transparency and reporting of outages to users. What level of transparency and reporting do you think we will see from FirstNet on system reliability and restoration times? We provide continuous system status updates to the users of our statewide 800 system which we consider critical for a public safety grade system. Today during emergencies, we get little to no information on cell site and circuit outages from the major providers. Without this information from FirstNet in almost real-time it will be hard [to] put a lot of faith into FirstNet for primary voice communications. Maybe you could touch on this in the LMR to LTE webinar.”

I think this is a great question to be answered by the folks at FirstNet, the only thing I am not sure of is if it can be answered before the FirstNet/Public Safety partner has been chosen. But let’s see what response we get from the folks at FirstNet. I am sure this issue has been discussed at great length as they have moved forward. Continue reading

TRDaily Reports NPSTC Names New Committee Vice Chair

Charlie Sasser has been named vice chair of the National Public Safety Telecommunications Council’s Spectrum Management Committee. Mr. Sasser represents the National Association of State Technology Directors on the NPSTC governing board. He works on enterprise data governance strategies and public safety communications spectrum management for the state of Georgia.

 

 

FCC Reaches $2.4 M Settlement with GCI for Wireless 911 Outages in Alaska

News Release. Adopted:  07/05/2016.

The Federal Communications Commission’s Enforcement Bureau has reached a $2.4 million settlement with General Communication, Inc. (GCI), resolving an investigation into five 911 service outages that occurred on the company’s wireless network in various parts of Alaska between August 2008 and April 2016.  As part of the settlement, GCI has agreed to strengthen its procedures for providing 911 service and to adopt robust compliance measures to ensure that it adheres to the FCC’s 911 service reliability and outage notification rules in the future. “Americans should be able to reach 911 at any time, whether they live in New York City or a village in Alaska,” said Travis LeBlanc, Chief of the FCC’s Enforcement Bureau. “We will continue to work with service providers across the nation to ensure they meet this critical expectation to protect the public’s safety.”

News Media Contact: Will Wiquist at (202) 418-0509, email: Will.Wiquist@fcc.gov  EB  https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-340164A1.docx

https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-340164A1.pdf