Vendors Invited to Participate in 911 Indoor Location Test Bed

February 3, 2017–The 9-1-1 Location Technologies Test Bed LLC today invited vendors of location accuracy technologies to participate in Stage 3 of the test bed. “Stages 1 and 2 of the Test Bed focused on verifying the indoor performance of existing or commercially available 9-1-1 location technologies. Stage 3 will now focus on location technologies in a variety of production-ready stages,” a news release noted. “The availability of Stage 3 demonstrates the wireless industry and public safety community’s commitment to considering how new technologies can continue to enhance the capabilities of our nation’s 9-1-1 system. Stage 3 testing is on schedule to occur in the San Francisco and Atlanta regions later this year. All test results are confidential to the test participants, but participants are encouraged to share summary results with wireless industry and public safety stakeholders who can evaluate the performance of various technologies.”

CTIA established the test bed pursuant to the indoor 911 location accuracy order that the FCC adopted in 2015 (TRDaily, Jan. 29, 2015). “Public safety is critically important to the wireless industry and consumers. We are working collaboratively with the public safety community to thoroughly evaluate new technologies under real-life conditions,” said Tom Sawanobori, vice president of the test bed entity. “We look forward to Stage 3 of the 9-1-1 location technology testing to support further innovation in emergency communications, including indoor location accuracy. We are pleased that this testing infrastructure is helping evaluate whether new communications technologies will improve 9-1-1 location accuracy and help first responders and consumers.”

Vendors that want to participate in Stage 3 of testing can visit http://www.911locationtestbed.org/ or e-mail omagnusson@911locationtestbed.org. —Paul Kirby, paul.kirby@wolterskluwer.com

Courtesy TRDaily

Public Safety Entities Stress Concerns About 911 Apps

February 3, 2017–A number of public safety entities have echoed concerns about how 911 apps interface with 911 systems, and some want FCC action, but several industry parties, including a group that represents app developers, say the FCC lacks the authority to take steps recommended by a public safety organization. Comments were filed by yesterday’s deadline in Rulemaking 11780 in response to a public notice issued in December by the FCC’s Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, which solicited comment in the wake of a filing by the National Association of State 911 Administrators (NASNA) that complained about 911 apps (TRDaily, Dec. 19, 2016).

“NASNA states that its members have had ‘real-world’ experiences with 911 apps that ‘concern [them] greatly,’ including: a 911 app that ‘enables the end-user to over-ride location information generated by the device and send a different location to 911’; a 911 app vendor that ‘published NASNA’s logo on its Website and promotional materials without permission, claiming NASNA has endorsed its product,’ and other 911 app providers that have ‘briefed FCC and Department of Homeland Security staff, [placing] these agencies’ logos on their promotional material’; app providers making misleading claims that ‘911 location does not work from mobile phones,’ ‘cellular technology is unreliable,’ or that an app will ‘get help to [the end-user] faster and more reliably than simply calling 911’; and 911 apps that are not compatible with standard wireless 911 capabilities, such as one app that delivers 911 calls as VoIP calls for which ‘the normal wireless re-bid function cannot be performed when there is a need for more precise location,’” the bureau observed in the public notice.

The public notice continued, “Citing ‘the critical nature of 911 as the primary mechanism for the public to gain access to public safety services,’ NASNA requests that the Commission consider initiating a proceeding to address ‘concerns regarding how these applications and services interface with existing 911 systems,’ including: (1) ensuring that 911 apps ‘will not harm in any way how consumers currently access 911 service from a smartphone, including slowing down the process of gaining access to the 911 system’ and do not ‘present a danger to emergency responders, or interfere or impede them in the process of responding to calls for service’; (2) prohibiting 911 apps from ‘overrid[ing] location information generated by the device and enabling location data to be “spoofed” in a manner that displays information for the purposes of misleading the PSAP and first responders’; (3) ensuring that 911 apps ‘have been thoroughly tested to specific standards, including interoperability and downstream dispatching considerations’; (4) ensuring that ‘911 app providers are factually accurate in their marketing materials and do not mislead the public regarding how the product works,’ do not mislead as to whether ‘a state, regional, or local 911 governmental authority has approved, supports, or endorses, any particular product,’ and do not inaccurately claim that ‘the lack of cellular or broadband coverage in any geographic area’ is a failure of a 911 system; (5) ensuring that 911 apps will not ‘accidentally generate repeated pocket dialed 911 calls or 911 texts’ or ‘generate duplicate requests for emergency assistance automatically’; (6) providing for ‘the development of specific standards for communicating and displaying supplemental consumer or incident information in the context of a 911 [call] for dispatching purposes’; and (7) requiring that 911 apps adhere to ‘industry standards for the interconnection to [Next Generation] 911 systems and ensuring that 911 apps use appropriate public safety grade delivery networks and methods for message routing.’” Continue reading

Wireline Competition Bureau Rescinds Lifeline Designations

February 3, 2017–The FCC’s Wireline Competition Bureau released an order on reconsideration today rescinding Lifeline broadband provider (LBP) designation for nine carriers, citing the need to take more steps to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse in the program. The order was among a slew of items released today rescinding or retracting items released shortly before FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler left the agency last month (see separate story).The order on reconsideration released today reconsidered orders that had designated the following providers as Lifeline broadband providers (LBP): Spot On Networks LLC, Boomerang Wireless LLC, KonaTel, Inc., STS Media, Inc., Applied Research Designs, Inc., Kajeet, Inc., Liberty Cablevision of Puerto Rico LLC, Northland Cable Television, Inc., and Wabash Independent Networks, Inc.

The Wireline Competition Bureau had designated the carriers as LBPs in orders released in December and January. “The Bureau sets aside those orders, revokes the LBP designations for those providers, returns those petitions for LBP designation to their status as petitions pending before the Bureau, and removes them from streamlined treatment in light of the considerations discussed below,” according to the order, which was adopted in WC dockets 09-197 and 11-42.

“We find that reconsidering the above-listed petitions for designation as an LBP would promote program integrity by providing the Bureau with additional time to consider measures that might be necessary to prevent further waste, fraud, and abuse in the Lifeline program,” the bureau said. “Recent investigations in the Lifeline program raise concerns that substantial waste, fraud, and abuse appears to continue to exist in the program. For example, in December 2016 the Enforcement Bureau entered into a consent decree with Total Call Mobile, in which Total Call Mobile admitted to violating Lifeline program rules to claim reimbursement for duplicate and ineligible consumers and paid a settlement of $30 million. The Universal Service Administrative Company has also indicated that at least 16 other major Lifeline wireless resellers have used tactics similar to Total Call Mobile’s.” Continue reading

Mission Critical Reports: Standard for Exchange of Emergency Data Approved

The Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO) International received approval from the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) for an American National Standard (ANS) that identifies standard specifications for the exchange of emergency data. The Emergency Incident Data Document (EIDD) provides standardized industry-neutral National Information Exchange Model (NIEM) conformant (XML-based) specifications for exchanging emergency incident information to agencies and regions that implement next-generation 9-1-1 (NG 9-1-1) and IP-based emergency communications systems. Emergency incident information exchanges supported by the EIDD include exchanges between disparate manufacturers’ systems located within one or more public-safety agencies and with other incident stakeholders.

Read article here: http://www.rrmediagroup.com/News/NewsDetails/newsID/15143

View the standard here: http://npstc.org/download.jsp?tableId=37&column=217&id=3859&file=11161_2015_APCO_Data_Exch_Std_150416.pdf

APCO Announces Webinar: TDM Transition to Ethernet for Public Safety With Cybersecurity in Mind

The Webinar will be held on Wednesday, February 22, 2017, from 2:00 p.m. – 3:00 p.m. ET. The communities supported by public safety are technology-savvy and pushing public safety agencies to be more connected to the world, but transitioning from a legacy TDM networks to ethernet can make agencies more vulnerable to cybersecurity attacks. IPKeys will present the benefits of an ethernet network and some steps to ease the migration. They will also share the cybersecurity measures needed to protect public safety’s LMR & LTE network and to mitigate the risk for NG9-1-1 networks connecting to ESINet. Drawing from its deep knowledge and experience with complex Department of Defense cybersecurity programs, IPKeys will offer suggestions to help manage cybersecurity risks during and after a transition to an ethernet system.

The communities supported by public safety are technology-savvy and pushing public safety agencies to be more connected to the world, but transitioning from a legacy TDM networks to ethernet can make agencies more vulnerable to cybersecurity attacks. IPKeys will present the benefits of an ethernet network and some steps to ease the migration. They will also share the cybersecurity measures needed to protect public safety’s LMR & LTE network and to mitigate the risk for NG9-1-1 networks connecting to ESINet. Drawing from its deep knowledge and experience with complex Department of Defense cybersecurity programs, IPKeys will offer suggestions to help manage cybersecurity risks during and after a transition to an ethernet system. The panel mirrors public safety’s world, including a network engineer subject matter expert who wants to connect everyone and a cybersecurity subject matter expert who wants to keep everyone out.

 

 

FCC Bureaus, Offices Rescind Actions Taken During Wheeler Tenure

February 3, 2017–In actions taken at the bureau and office level today, the FCC has terminated investigations into the zero-rating and sponsored-data offerings of several providers and rescinded a notice of inquiry and various orders, reports, white papers, and guidance issued during the tenure of former Democratic Chairman Tom Wheeler—sparking sharp criticism from the agency’s only remaining Democratic Commissioner that no adequate explanation was offered for the rescissions. In addition to the zero-rating inquiry, issues covered by the rescinded items include the agency’s efforts to modernize its Lifeline and E-rate programs; cybersecurity risk reduction; guidance on the processing of proposals for broadcast shared services agreements; and 5G wireless network and device security.

Most of the actions and items rescinded were only a few weeks old, but rescinded letters stemming from the zero-rating investigation date back as far as late 2015, and the guidance on broadcast sharing arrangements dates back to March 2014. The rescissioning began yesterday when the Media Bureau set aside an order on reconsideration aimed at promoting broadcast ownership diversity adopted in early January.  The bureau said that it has concluded that petitions for reconsideration to which it was responding would be “more appropriately handled at the Commission level” (TRDaily, Feb. 2).

Today, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai explained that the rescissions were in response to the adoption of “midnight regulations” under his predecessor.  “In the waning days of the last Administration, the Federal Communications Commission’s Bureaus and Offices released a series of controversial orders and reports. In some cases, Commissioners were given no advance notice whatsoever of these midnight regulations. In other cases, they were issued over the objection of two of the four Commissioners. And in all cases, their release ran contrary to the wishes expressed by the leadership of our congressional oversight committees. These last-minute actions, which did not enjoy the support of the majority of Commissioners at the time they were taken, should not bind us going forward. Accordingly, they are being revoked,” Chairman Pai said.

Commissioner Mignon L. Clyburn, the only Democrat remaining on the Commission, criticized the actions. “Today is apparently ‘take out the trash day.’ In an eponymous episode of the West Wing, White House Chief of Staff Josh Lyman stated: ‘Any stories we have to give the press that we’re not wild about, we give all in a lump on Friday . . . Because no one reads the paper on Saturday.’ Today multiple Bureaus retract—without a shred of explanation—several items released under the previous administration that focus on competition, consumer protection, cybersecurity and other issues core to the FCC’s mission,” she said. “In the past, then-Commissioner Pai was critical of the agency majority for not providing sufficient reasoning behind its decisions, citing specifically to the Supreme Court case Fox v. FCC which states: ‘[T]he requirement that an agency provide reasoned explanation for its action would ordinarily demand that it display awareness that it is changing position. An agency may not, for example, depart from a prior policy sub silentio,’” she added. Continue reading

Carriers to Use FCC 911 Form in Future Report

February 1, 2017–The four nationwide wireless carriers don’t plan to use an FCC form for the reports they plan to file Feb. 3 on initial 911 location accuracy live call data, but they plan to modify a carrier consensus format for subsequent quarterly reports, CTIA told the FCC in an ex parte filing yesterday in PS docket 07-114. “The nationwide carriers are refining their initial quarterly Live Call Data reports, consistent with the report format submitted by CTIA on December 15, 2016 (carrier format). On January 18, 2017, the [Public Safety and Homeland Security] Bureau released a public notice and new report form (FCC Form) directing wireless carriers to ‘break out live call data for each Test City or relevant service area’ and include additional data not included in the carrier format. The nationwide carriers will work diligently and in good faith to modify the IT and analytic systems designed around the carrier format to align with the new FCC Form for future reports.

“Carriers will determine when those system changes can be completed and may follow up with Bureau staff as needed. Carriers will also provide the reports to APCO, NENA and NASNA, once appropriate confidentiality protections are in place. As noted in CTIA’s January 9, 2016 ex parte filing, during a meeting between the nationwide carriers, CTIA, and FCC staff, ‘all agreed upcoming compliance certifications will be based solely on data aggregated across all six monitoring regions….’ Continue reading

Andy Seybold’s Public Safety Advocate, February 2, 2017

Last week’s Public Safety Advocate post was one of the most widely read in the past six months and the input I have been receiving is all positive. Obviously, I did not expect to hear from FirstNet or its CTO and certainly not any of those who submitted a bid in response to the FirstNet RFP. However, I did receive many responses from first responders, vendors, and elected officials, both in this country and elsewhere. So, I have to conclude there is interest not only in when FirstNet will become real but also in how it will serve the Public Safety community.

Therefore, this week’s Advocate will take a look at another portion of the FirstNet system: the device side. Different devices will be used by executives, administrators, top-ranking officials, and down through the ranks to those with their feet on the ground serving the American public. In particular, the points I hope to make are that this is not a one-size-fits-all market and there are significant differences in some aspects of the types of devices that need to be developed for those in the field versus those who serve in administrative positions.

Each classification will probably have different device requirements, and many Public Safety personnel are already carrying two devices, their two-way or Land Mobile Radio (LMR), and their wireless broadband or cell phone device. Some of the cell phones are issued by a city or county and some belong to the personnel themselves and are used in their down time to stay in touch, and even sometimes during incidents to gather more information. So the question is when FirstNet is up and running and has proved itself to the Public Safety community, will the Public Safety community simply stop using their LMR devices in favor of their FirstNet devices? Continue reading