When FirstNet released the final RFP it allowed for questions to be asked until February 12, 2016. This is a great opportunity for prospective bidders and their partners to gain a level of clarification. However, to submit a question you must use a FirstNet form that does provide a method for asking the question, but does not allow for putting the question into context. In some cases the context is as important as the question. While a question may seem arbitrary or unwarranted, if it is preceded by a statement containing pertinent information there can be a better understanding of the rationale for asking it, thus a more appropriate answer can be forthcoming.
My example is the requirement within the RFP that the successful bidder (partner) have 50% of the Public Safety device connection target by 24 months after the contract award and 100% by 48 months after or face large monetary penalties. I presume these requirements are in the RFP to preclude a partner from building the network and then not trying in earnest to get the first responder community to use it, so the partner has more access to the spectrum. In this case, both the timeline for these requirements and the percentages are not, in my estimation, achievable by any company, even the four largest wireless network operators. Apparently the vendor is supposed to provide the target numbers, but FirstNet says there are “between 3 and 12 million first responders.” Is this target then tied to 50% of 3 million or 50% of 12 million (a very high and questionable number). I have to ask whether this 12 million is sworn personnel only or if it includes all of the civilians.
The RFP’s definition of a Public Safety user is a “User of the NPSBN that provides public safety services.” Next, I believe network usage will expand from the top down in organizations. That is, the initial FirstNet customers will be chiefs and line officers who will try out the network for command and control and see how it works and whether it provides the same level (or better) coverage they currently experience with one of the commercial networks. Over time, as the network matures and more devices that are designed for field use come on the market, network usage might spread to an entire department. My biggest concern is that network operators with networks in place and already serving the Public Safety community will compete with FirstNet if they are not the successful bidder.”
The biggest issue here is that according to the law, there is no requirement that a Public Safety agency make use of FirstNet. Network operators can move their pricing anywhere they want. Public Safety is a small but prestigious portion of their total user population and two of the networks already offer a form of priority access to the first responder community. Even though it does not include full, ruthless pre-emption, it is better than it was before. If one of the network operators becomes the FirstNet partner the other three will, of course, do what they can to keep their own installed base of Public Safety users.
My final points have to do with how much of the network can be in place by month 24 of the contract. This is not clear as it will depend on the chosen partner and could vary widely. The vendor (partner) must have devices available and establish a sales and marketing program that will provide easy access to the network and the devices. Further, it will to take time to train people in how to deal with the Public Safety community, cities, counties, and states, and some of the buying cycles could be extended because of having to wait for the following year’s budget for funds. I would rate the likelihood of ANY potential vendor/partner being able to meet the percentage of use in the time periods allocated as slim to none. That means as part of the RFP decision the bidder will have to accept the fact that they will be penalized a lot of money, or it means FirstNet will have to make changes to sections that address this issue.
Either way, as you can see, the context of the question asked is as important as the question itself, because it could include items FirstNet may not have thought through completely. FirstNet’s stated goal with the RFP is to attract a number of qualified bids from potential partners, and it has done a pretty good job of changing the RFP to reflect that interest. Even so, there are still areas of the documents such as this that could push the fence sitters over the other side into the no response column. Have a Great Weekend! Andy
FirstNet seeks partner for public safety broadband network – InfraPPP World via Google Alerts Jan 21 12:55 First Responder Network Authority (FirstNet) has launched a request for proposals (RFP) for a nationwide public safety broadband network in the USA.
FirstNet’s RFP Could Lead to Spectrum Bonanza for Public Safety Wireless Vendors – FedTech Magazine via Google Alerts Jan 20 16:25 Now that the First Responder Network Authority (FirstNet) has issued its request for proposal (RFP), wireless network vendors and carriers are poring …
FirstNet outlines four phases of RFP evaluation process during webinar – Urgent Communications via Google Alerts Jan 20 14:55 … that week will need to complete a four-phase process to be selected to build and operate the proposed nationwide public-safety broadband network, …
FirstNet Releases Final RFP for Up to $6.5 Billion – CommLaw Monitor via Google Alerts Jan 19 22:05 FirstNet released its final Request for Proposals (RFP) seeking a Contractor to build and operate the nationwide public safety broadband network (NPSBN), a. …
Continued Progress Toward the Nation’s First Public Safety Broadband Network – FirstNet via Google Alerts Jan 19 22:05 1, January 2016 By TJ Kennedy, President, First Responder Network …
GOP Sens. Question FCC Broadband Speed Definitions – Multichannel News via Google Alerts Jan 21 18:40 They argue that while the FCC is using that to mearure access to broadband, it is using a different metric for rural broadband, and regulating Internet …
Coalition Urges FCC To Set Strong Broadband Privacy Rules – The Marshalltown via Google Alerts Jan 21 15:30 Last year, as part of its net neutrality rule-making, the FCC reclassified …
Broadband CPNI Could Be New Privacy Battleground – Multichannel News via Google Alerts Jan 21 10:10 So, if FCC acts, this could be a major change in the way the consumer data business is …
GSMA: Philippines is one of only 2 countries in the world that have unused 700 MHz frequency – Asianjournal.com via Google Alerts Jan 21 04:10 The group added that the 700 MHz Digital Dividend (DD) band is key for expanding mobile broadband into the outlying islands and rural provinces in …
Privacy warriors plead with FCC to wield sword of net neutrality against snooping ISPs – Zicos via Google Alerts Jan 20 20:30 Wheeler lobbied on new rules for broadband customer info The US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has been urged to put in place …
Rights Groups Push For Strong Broadband Privacy Rules – Slashdot Jan 20 13:00 An anonymous reader writes: A coalition of rights groups has sent a letter to the U.S. Federal Communications Commission asking for tougher privacy regulations on providers of broadband internet services. The letter was sent by the ACLU, the EFF, Public Citizen, and over 50 other groups. “Critics say broadband providers are already harvesting huge amounts of consumer data for use in targeted advertising, the groups wrote. ‘This can create a chilling effect on speech and…
1 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Telecommunications and Information Administration … – s3.amazonaws.com via Google Alerts Jan 15 10:40 National Telecommunications and Information Administration …
US issues RFP for public safety network – Total Telecom Jan 15 10:00 FirstNet aims to award contract for $7 billion infrastructure project by fourth quarter.
Mexican regulator to launch tender for shared 4G network – Developing Telecoms via Google Alerts Jan 15 09:02 Mexico is auctioning AWS from 15 February, and will sell 700 MHz of spectrum on January 29, which is reserved for a shared 4G network. Ifetel has …
Testing high power UE in LTE Band 14 for public safety – Rohde & Schwarz via Google Alerts Jan 15 08:40 World’s first high-power user equipment (HPUE) testing has been demonstrated by Rohde & Schwarz and Elektrobit at the GSMA Mobile World …
What’s in store for IoT in 2016? – M2M World News via Google Alerts Jan 15 08:10 3GPP is due to deliver the standard for Narrowband IoT. The stated expectation is to see a final standard around March or April. We expect a little later …
Congress to cable customers: Stop your whining – InfoWorld Jan 15 06:45 Congress is launching yet another attack on Net neutrality by advancing a bill that would strip the FCC of authority to investigate complaints about cable companies. Net neutrality rules have been under a two-pronged attack ever since they passed last year. On one front, Internet providers are suing the FCC to overturn rules that reclassified broadband as a common carrier service. Meanwhile, their lackeys in Congress have repeatedly tried to pass measures that would defund the agency or prohibit it from enforcing Net neutrality until the lawsuits are settled — which could be years down the line. To read this article…